Competência de feedback do corpo docente universitário: projeto e validação de um instrumento para autoavaliação
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.20072872e.2026.50.1936Palavras-chave:
competência em feedback, corpo docente universitário, avaliação para aprendizagem, validação de questionáriosResumo
A avaliação para aprendizagem destacou a necessidade de que os professores universitários desenvolvam competências específicas de feedback. Embora o conceito da teacher feedback literacy tenha sido amplamente conceituado na literatura, atualmente existem poucos instrumentos disponíveis para sua avaliação e não há ferramentas validadas em espanhol voltadas para esses profissionais. Nosso objetivo foi projetar e validar um questionário para avaliar a competência de feedback do corpo docente universitário. Com base na revisão da literatura especializada e em um processo de validação por revisão de especialistas, uma versão inicial foi desenvolvida e administrada a uma amostra de docentes universitários. Posteriormente, foi realizada uma análise fatorial exploratória para examinar sua estrutura interna e várias análises de confiabilidade para avaliar suas propriedades psicométricas. Os resultados nos permitiram obter uma versão final composta por 18 itens organizados em quatro dimensões. A estrutura obtida é coerente com os modelos contemporâneos de competência em feedback e oferece uma ferramenta útil para pesquisa, diagnóstico e desenho de ações de formação no ensino superior. São discutidas as implicações do instrumento para o desenvolvimento profissional do professor e para a melhoria das práticas de avaliação orientadas para a aprendizagem.
Downloads
Referências
ANECA (2012), Guía de apoyo para la elaboración de la memoria de verificación de títulos oficiales universitarios.
Baartman, Liesbeth K. J. y Frans Prins (2018), “Transparency or stimulating meaningfulness and self-regulation? A case study about a programmatic approach to transparency of assessment criteria”, Frontiers in Education, vol. 3, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00104>.
Black, Paul y Dylan Wiliam (1998), “Assessment and classroom learning”, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, vol. 5, núm. 1, pp. 7-74, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102>.
Boud, David y Margaret Bearman (2024), “The assessment challenge of social and collaborative learning in higher education”, Educational Philosophy and Theory, vol. 56, núm. 5, pp. 459-468.
Boud, David y Phillip Dawson (2023), “What feedback literate teachers do: an empirically-derived competency framework”, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 48, núm. 2, pp. 158-171, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1910928>.
Buckingham Shum, Simon, Lisa-Angelique Lim, David Boud, Margaret Bearman y Phillip Dawson (2023), “A comparative analysis of the skilled use of automated feedback tools through the lens of teacher feedback literacy”, International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 20, núm. 40, <https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00410-9>.
Cano, Elena, Andrea Jardí, Laia Lluch, Ludmila Martins (2024), “Improvement in the quality of feedback as an indication of the development of evaluative judgement”, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 49, núm. 6, pp. 824-837, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2329170>.
Cano, Elena, Laura Pons y Laia Lluch (2018), “Análisis de experiencias de innovación docente universitaria sobre evaluación”, Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, vol. 22, núm. 4, pp. 11-32, <http://revistaseug.ugr.es/index.php/profesorado/article/view/8392/7135>.
Carless, David y David Boud (2018), “The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback”, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 43, núm. 8, pp. 1315-1325, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354>.
Carless, David y Naomi Winstone (2023), “Teacher feedback literacy and its interplay with student feedback literacy”, Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 28, núm. 1, pp. 150-163, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1782372>.
Chen, Hao, Shang Zhang, Jie Xu y Rui Du (2024) “Effect of the teacher-student relationships on feedback literacy of high school students in Tibetan areas of China: mediating effect of emotional intelligence and moderating effect of ethnicity category”, The Asia-Pacific Educational Research, núm. 33, vol. 2, pp. 419-429, <https://doi-org.sire.ub.edu/10.1007/s40299-023-00739-9>.
Chen, Patricia, Omar Chavez, Desmong C. Ong y Brenda Gunderson (2017), “Strategic resource use for learning: a self-administered intervention that guides self-reflection on effective resource use enhances academic performance”, Psychological Science, vol. 28, núm. 6, pp. 774-785, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617696456>.
Chi Chen y Andy Jiahao Liu (2024), “Understanding partnerships in teacher and student feedback literacy: shared responsibility”, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, vol. 61, núm. 1, pp. 31-44, <https://doi-org.sire.ub.edu/10.1080/14703297.2022.2153722>.
Dawson, Phillip Zi Yan, Anastasiya Lipnevich, Joanna Tai, David Boud y Paige Mahoney (2023), “Measuring what learners do in feedback: The feedback literacy behaviour scale”, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 49, núm. 3, pp. 348-362, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2240983>.
Deneen, Christopher C. y Hui-Teng Hoo (2021), “Connecting teacher and student assessment literacy with self-evaluation and peer feedback”, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 48, núm. 2, pp. 214-226, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1967284>.
Hattie, John y Helen Timperley (2007), “The power of feedback”, Review of Educational Research, vol. 77, núm. 1, pp. 81-112, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487>.
Hervás, Gabriel y José Luís Medina (2020), “Professorat novell a les universitats catalanes: anàlisi dels seus programes formatius”, REIRE Revista d’Innovació i Recerca en Educació, vol. 13, núm. 2, pp. 1-19, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1344/reire2020.13.230614>.
Huisman, Bart, Nadira Saab, Paul van den Broek y Jan van Driel (2019), “The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students’ academic writing: a meta-analysis”, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 44, núm. 6, pp. 863-880, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1545896>.
Jiang, Lianjiang y Shulin Yu (2021), “Understanding changes in EFL teachers’ feedback practice during covid-19: implications for teacher feedback literacy at a time of crisis”, The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, vol. 30, pp. 509-518, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00583-9>.
Le Boterf, Guy (2010), Repenser la compétence. Pour dépasser les idées reçues: quinze propositions, París, Editions d’Organisation. Lee, Icy, Mehmet Karaca y Serhat Inan (2023), “The development and validation of a scale on L2 writing teacher feedback literacy”, Assessing Writing, núm. 57, artículo núm. 100743, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100743>.
Lee, Icy y Zhicheng Mao (2024), “Writing teacher feedback literacy: Surveying second language teachers’ knowledge, values, and abilities”, Journal of Second Language Writing, núm. 63, núm. de artículo 101094, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101094>.
Lui, Angela M. y Heidi L. Andrade (2022), “The next black box of formative assessment: a model of the internal mechanisms of feedback processing”, Frontiers in Education, vol. 7, artículo núm. 751548, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.751548>.
Narciss, Susanne (2008), “Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks”, en Jan Elen van Merriënboer, J. Michael Spector, M. David Merrill y M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 125-144, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203880869.ch11>.
Nicol, David J. y Debra Macfarlane-Dick (2006), “Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice”, Studies in Higher Education, vol. 31, núm. 2, pp. 199-218, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090>.
Panadero, Ernesto, Gavin, T. L. Brown y Jan-Willem Strijbos (2016), “The future of student selfassessment: a review of known unknowns and potential directions”, Educational Psychology Review, vol. 28, núm. 4, pp. 803-830, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9350-2>.
Panadero, Ernesto y Anastasiya Lipnevich (2022), “A review of feedback models and typologies: towards an integrative model of feedback elements”, Educational Research Review, vol. 35, artículo núm. 100416, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100416>.
Panadero, Ernesto, Juan Fraile, Javier Fernández Ruiz, David Castilla-Estévez y Miguel Ángel Ruiz (2019), “Spanish university assessment practices: examination tradition with diversity by faculty,” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 44, núm. 3, pp. 379-397, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1512553>.
Pastore. Serafina y Heidi L. Andrade (2019), “Teacher assessment literacy: a three-dimensional model”, Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 84, pp. 128-138, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.05.003>.
Schut, Suzanne, Lauren A. Maggio, Sylvia Heeneman, Jan van Tartwijk, Cees van der Vleuten y Erik Driessen (2021), “Where the rubber meets the road—An integrative review of programmatic assessment in health care professions education”, Perspectives on Medical Education, núm. 10, pp. 6-13, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1007/S40037-020-00625-W>.
Sokhanvar, Zahra, Keyvan Salehi y Fatemeh Sokhanvar (2021), “Advantages of authentic assessment for improving the learning experience and employability skills of higher education students: a systematic literature review”, Studies in Educational Evaluation, vol. 70, núm. de artículo 101030, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101030>.
Taylor, Lynda (2013), “Communicating the theory, practice, and principles of language testing to test stakeholders: some reflections”, Language Testing, vol. 30, núm. 3, pp. 403-412, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532213480338>.
Torre, Dario M., L. W. T. Schuwirth y Cees van der Vleuten (2020), “Theoretical considerations on programmatic assessment”, Medical Teacher, vol. 42, núm. 2, pp. 213-220, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2019.1672863>.
Vaessen, Bram E., Antoine van den Beemt, Gerard van de Watering, Ludo W. van Meeuwen, Lex Lemmens y Perry den Brok (2017), “Students’ perception of frequent assessments and its relation to motivation and grades in a statistics course: a pilot study”, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 42, núm. 6, pp. 872-886, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1204532>.
Walsh, Jackie Acree (2023), Feedback formativo. Diálogo significativo para mejorar el aprendizaje, Madrid, SM.
Wang Yongliang, Ali Derakhshan, Ziwen Pan y Farhad Ghiasvand (2023), “Chinese efl teachers’ writing assessment feedback literacy: a scale development and validation study”, Assessing Writing, núm. 56, núm. de artículo 100726, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100726>.
Xu Yueting, y Gavin T. L. Brown (2016), “Teacher assessment literacy in practice: a reconceptualization,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 58, pp. 149-162, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.010>.
Zhan, Ying (2022), “Developing and validating a student feedback literacy scale”, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 47, núm. 7, pp. 1087-1100, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.2001430>.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2026 Universidad Autónoma de México
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
