Scientific, technological, and innovation parks as catalysts for regional development: a state of the art from the triple helix perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.20072872e.2026.50.2192Keywords:
innovative ecosystems, technology transfer, regional development, academic entrepreneurship, universitiesAbstract
This paper presents a state of the art on science, technology and innovation Parks from the perspective of the triple helix (university-industry-government) and its quadruple and quintuple extensions. Based on a review of Galvao et al. (2019), the document identifies sustained growth in academic interest since 2003. The studies are organized into four lines: innovation policies, entrepreneurial universities, business strategy, and regional development. Recent literature (2018-2023) highlights the role of these parks in technology transfer, entrepreneurship, and the consolidation of innovation ecosystems, conditioned by institutional articulations and effective public policies.
Downloads
References
Bases de datos
Science Direct (2023), <https://www.sciencedirect.com/>.
Web of Science (2023), <https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/summary/042ca642-205e-498cacbb-0e5a007e47cd-8538dad4/times-citeddescending/1>.
Wiley Online Library (2023), <https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/>.
Bibliografía
Carayannis, Elias G. y David F. J. Campbell (2011), Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems. Twenty-first-century democracy, innovation, and entrepreneurship for development, Nueva York, Springer, DOI: <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2062-0_1>.
Etzkowitz, Henry y Loet Leydesdorff (2000), “The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a triple helix of universityindustry- government relations”, Research Policy, vol. 29, núm. 2, pp. 109-123, DOI: <https://DOI.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4>.
Etzkowitz, Henry y Loet Leydesdorff (1995), “The triple helix—university-industry-government relations: a laboratory for knowledge based economic development”, EASST Review, vol. 14, núm. 1, pp. 14-19.
Galvao, Anderson, Carla Mascarenhas, Carla Marques, João Ferreira y Vanessa Ratten (2019), “Triple helix and its evolution: a systematic literature review”, Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, vol. 10, núm. 3, pp. 812-833, DOI: <https://DOI.org/10.1108/JSTPM-10-2018-0103>.
Page, Matthew J., Joanne E. McKenzie, Patrick M. Bossuyt, Isabelle Boutron, Tammy C. Hoffmann, Cynthia D. Mulrow, Larissa Shamseer, Jennifer M. Tetzlaff, Elie A. Akl, Sue E. Brennan, Roger Chou, Julie Glanville, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Manoj M. Lalu, Tianjing Li, Elizabeth W. Loder, Evan Mayo-Wilson, Steve McDonald, Luke A. McGuinness, Lesley A. Stewart, James Thomas, Andrea C. Tricco, Vivian A. Welch, Penny Whiting, David Moher (2021), “The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews”, The BMJ, vol. 372, núm. 71, DOI: <https://DOI.org/10.1136/bmj.n71>.
Pique, Joseph M., Jasmina Berbegal-Mirabent y Henry Etzkowitz (2018), “Triple helix and the evolution of ecosystems of innovation: the case of Silicon Valley”, Triple Helix, vol. 5, núm. de artículo 11, DOI: <https://DOI.org/10.1186/s40604-018-0060-x>.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Universidad Autónoma de México
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
